Barbarism vs. Civility |
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo I used to believe that barbarism was simply an exhibition of ignorance and frustration among uneducated people who have penned up angst and confusion and have learned through their life that violence takes no thought, diplomacy or compromise. In the past they have been rewarded quickly for their violent solutions. I believe this is why barbarism will be very hard to eradicate. It has been said that in a battle, be it war or conversation, irrational barbarism will triumph every time because the civilized rational man must follow the rules of reason, while the irrational barbarian may act or speak on emotions alone which gives him the upper hand. Ultimately the civilized man is forced to act on barbarous terms to subdue the irrational man. It must be a secondary act for the civilized man after diplomacy fails. If the self proclaimed civilized man lashes out first without totally exhausting his rational diplomatic options, he is no rational man at all and has compromised his humanity and civility away. There is many people of all types of economic, intellectual and social
status in America. I will tell you now that a barbarous individual can
play the role of a sophisticated entrepreneur, a high ranking government
leader, a psychiatrist, a teacher, or a preacher. A civilized person can
play the role of an ultimate fighting champion, a nuclear physicist, tattoo
artist, or demolition expert. My point is, you really have to get to know
a person before you can make a judgment about their civility. I used to
think it was based mostly on lack of education, but I have seen lately
that there is far more to it than that. |
|